Introduction
Summarizing a text has become a very convenient task, partly due to the rise of AI tools in the market. These summary makers utilize NLP algorithms to perfection, resulting in condensed, concise texts.
There are many benefits of using the online summarizers. Firstly, you can find a way to learn manual summarization techniques. Secondly, you can speed up the literature review by shortening up research papers, articles, blogs, etc.
Hence, the summarizing tools are a powerful source of knowledge and research for both professional writers and students.
In this article, we will discuss two summarizers, Quillbot and summarizer.org. We will overview their features, performance, pricing, etc., to conclude which one is the best summary generator for your convenience. So, you can revamp your workflow and increase your knowledge quickly.
Feature Comparison of Text Summarizers
We’ve divided the features into subsections to decide which one is the best AI summarizer for students and professionals. We’ll try to cover each aspect in detail to conclude a fair winner at the end.
1. Outlook (UI)
Comparing the interface of both summarizers, there are a lot of similarities. For instance, both tools have a slider to adjust the summary length, an input and output pane, and a summarize button to generate results.
However, AI Summarizer has a more sleek design. It gives users minimal options so that they aren’t lost while trying to understand the outputs.
Meanwhile, Quillbot comprehensive interface adds a lot of functionality with additional tabs in the top panel. However, this type of UI approach isn’t too suitable for beginner use.
Verdict: If we’re considering targeting laymen as the audience, we would rather go with AI Summarizer. It has all the necessary buttons to be classified as a proper text summarizer, and the simplicity of design suits a wider audience.
2. Performance
Here, we will try to give a research paper, and an article to both of the tools and see which one gives a more comprehensive answer.
AI Summarizer (Article Test)
First off, we have the AI Summarizer tool for testing. We’ve given it an online post from this website to check if the output is worth it or not.
Fair enough, the summarized text is significantly fewer words than the original output. Yet, it captures all the essence that the article presented.
Quillbot (Article Test)
To keep things fair, we’ll use the same article as we did before to test Quillbot’s output. Similarly, we won’t be tinkering with any settings and create outputs based on default options.
Judging from both outputs, the AI Summarizer has a better summary. It didn’t include any extra examples like the summary from Quillbot did. Plus, the result from AI Summarizer was more cohesive than the other one.
AI Summarizer (Research Paper Test)
This test will check the capability of both the summarizers in condensing down a full-fledged peer-reviewed research paper.
First, it’s summarizer.org’s turn and the paper we’re using is: A case study with CanSat. However, we could not copy the entire document into the tool since it only allows 3000 words in the free version.
Instead, we only picked up section 3.2.3 and got it summarized from the AI Summarizer website.
The output seems fair when considering the increased complexity of the input text. However, we did have to push the slider back to ‘Short’ to get a reasonable output.
Quillbot (Research Paper Test)
For Quillbot’s test, we will provide similar initial conditions. Only section 3.2.3 will be used from the research paper as Quillbot, too has a word limitation for the free version (1200 words, only.) The summary length is again set to ‘Short’ to get comparable results.
After analyzing, we can say that Quillbot’s version is better. The condensed texts completely explain the methodology carried out by the researchers while coding for the project, without exceeding the 100-word mark.
Verdict: This one is a tie for us because AI Summarizer performed better at general tasks, while Quillbot was more efficient in summarizing academic text. However, we’re still tilting towards AI summarizer because of its ability to cater to a large variety of tasks.
3. Pricing
As we’ve hinted before, both summarizers work on a freemium version. Meaning, that the tools provide free functionality for a limited number of options, then demand a premium price to unlock more.
Starting with Summarizer.org, the tool offers $9.99 per month to break the 3000-word limit on the free version.
Plus, it offers more tools in the package like an AI paraphraser, conclusion, sentence, and story generators, etc., making it a worthwhile deal.
You also unlock the AI summarizer 2.0 option, which makes even more impressive text summaries than the base 1.0 version.
Moving on to Quillbot’s subscription services. The tool charges $9.95 per month, which is nearly the same as the AI summarizer.
The package opens up more tools for use like plagiarism checker, which is locked in the free version. Additionally, we can see an increased word limit for AI paraphraser and summarizer, pushing your productivity to the next level.
Verdict: It’s a tie for pricing as well since both tools offer similar pricing and features in their premium versions.
4. Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous features are the ones that don’t directly impact the core functionalities of the summarizer, but add a nice touch for improving user experience.
This section is completely ruled by Quillbot’s summarizer, the reason being the additional features.
- Statistics Bar
- Selecting focused keywords
- Customizing option
The statistics bar shows numbers more excitingly. This can be a way to hook the audiences and their overall experience with the tool.
However, the keyword selection option is a crucial one. It allows you to reconstruct your summaries, revolving around one or more keywords of the original text. This is a true loss for summarizer.org, as it can show some form of impact on the output.
Finally, the custom feature in Quillbot’s summarizer is nothing more than just a gimmick. It loses the purpose of being a task-specific AI tool, to become an AI chatbot.
If that’s the case, ChatGPT 4o is much better at tailoring content for user-required parameters than Quillbot.
With all that being said, AI Summarizer matches Quillbot in terms of support for multiple languages and providing bullet points in the output. It pulls ahead of the latter by providing a ‘Best Line’ from the input text – a sentence that has all the gist of the context.
Verdict: We have to give this one to Quillbot just because the more the better. The said summarizer does lack the ‘Best Line’ feature. But, it pulls ahead because of its focus keywords, and statistical bar options.
5. Summary of Results
To start, we stated that this article will explore the best summarizer from a layman’s use case. Meaning, that although we found Quillbot better at academic tasks, AI Summarizer cleaned the competition with its blog, article, essay, and other generalized summarization tasks.
That said, let’s review the table below to recap how both summarizers stand when reviewed under different criteria.
Criteria | Summarizer.org | Quillbot |
UI | ✅ | |
Performance | ✅ | ✅ |
Pricing | ✅ | ✅ |
Miscellaneous | ✅ |
Reviewing these tests qualitatively, we can easily say that the two summarizers faired up quite well against each other. Hence, to make the situation clearer, we must conduct one final test as a tie-breaker.
Meta Description: Tie-breaker Test
Summarizing text for Meta description can be crucial for a site’s on-page SEO performance. This is a task that most business professionals will conduct to optimize their websites for better engagement and visibility.
Till now, Quillbot has won academic tasks (for students, educators, etc.) While, Summarizer.org has been found better for writers, bloggers, and general learning. First, let’s see how the AI summarizer constricts word count for a stellar Meta description.
The summarizer.org’s output is 20 words, which lies in the recommended word range for Meta Descriptions; around 160 characters.
Quillbot’s summarizer gives us 29 words, which is slightly on the lengthier side for a Meta Description.
Verdict: Considering the results of the tie-breaker test, we can say that the AI summarizer from summarizer.org wins the entire contest. It gives reliable results over a wide range of tasks, making it more suitable for a wider audience.
Conclusion
The use of AI summary generator has made text summarization a convenient task, offering benefits such as learning manual summarization techniques, speeding up literature reviews, and being a valuable source of knowledge for both professionals and students.
When comparing two popular summarizers, Quillbot, and summarizer.org, it was found that while Quillbot excelled in summarizing academic texts, summarizer.org performed better in general tasks like blogs, articles, and essays.
Ultimately, summarizer.org emerged as the winner due to its versatility and reliability across various tasks such as making Meta descriptions, and so on.
That’s all from this post! We hope you enjoyed reading our content!
Related Articles
Can Honorlock Detect Phones? (On Wifi, Airplane, LTE)
Can Honorlock Detect Screen Mirroring? (Or HDMI Splitter)
Does Proctorio Tell You When You’re Flagged?
Can Brightspace(D2L) Detect AI, ChatGPT or QuillBot?
Can Blackboard Detect AI? – Let’s Explore Now!
Can Blackboard Detect Copy & Paste?
Can Canvas Detect Split Screen? Latest Guide 2024!
